Review HSC maths marking without losing teacher control.
Submit student responses, inspect criteria-based suggested results and feedback, then accept or adjust the marking yourself. AI supports the review queue; it does not make the final professional judgement.
The expensive part is not adding marks. It is reading every line consistently.
A class set asks the same repeated questions of a teacher: what method did this student use, which criterion does it satisfy, and what feedback will help next? That work matters, but it can dominate evenings when several classes submit together.
curriq is designed to prepare a structured first pass while preserving the evidence a teacher needs to review it. Responses that are unclear, unconventional or high-stakes still deserve a careful human read.
A review workflow, not an automatic verdict
Collect responses
Upload the student work attached to a marking submission and keep the response evidence together.
Prepare a first pass
AI assistance evaluates the response against the supplied task context and criteria and drafts feedback for review.
Review and accept
Inspect the response, marks and feedback. The teacher remains responsible for correcting and accepting the result.
Spend review time where judgement matters most
One review queue
Keep responses, criteria, suggested marks and feedback in the same workflow instead of moving between disconnected files.
Class-level visibility
Review results by student and question so recurring gaps are easier to spot after marking is accepted.
Teacher sign-off
No automated suggestion should outrank the response in front of you. Final acceptance stays with the teacher.
Frequently asked questions
Does AI-assisted marking replace the teacher?
No. curriq prepares a marking result for review. The teacher can inspect the response, criteria and feedback, adjust the result where needed, and must accept it before the workflow is complete.
Can it review handwritten working?
The marking workflow accepts uploaded student-response files and keeps the original response available during review. Handwriting quality and image quality can affect automated interpretation, so unclear work needs teacher attention.
Is every maths response suitable for AI assistance?
No. Novel proofs, unusual valid methods, ambiguous working and extended reasoning require professional judgement. AI assistance is best treated as a first pass, not an authority.
How can I estimate my current marking workload?
Use the free HSC maths marking cost calculator to model class count, students, tasks and minutes per response. It reports hours and seven-hour workdays, with an optional dollar equivalent based only on the hourly cost you enter.
Keep exploring
See the review workflow in early access.
Join the teacher waitlist for product updates and an invitation when AI-assisted marking is available for your workflow.
Early access is currently free. We will explain any future pricing before it applies.