curriq marks student working-out steps against NESA criteria — not just final answers. Get per-student, per-outcome results for the entire class in minutes, not hours.
Join the waitlist — it's freeA class of 28 students. A 12-question assessment task. Three marks per question. That's over a thousand individual marks to assign — each requiring you to read the working, match it to the marking criteria, and record the result. Then redo the arithmetic for a summary.
Most HSC maths teachers report spending two to four hours marking a single class set. Across four assessment tasks a year, that's a week of marking per class — time that could be spent on the teaching that actually changes results.
curriq automates the routine part: reading the working and awarding marks per step according to NESA criteria. You review the results. The time you save is yours.
Students type their working directly, or photograph handwritten responses. curriq accepts both formats.
curriq evaluates the student's working against the NESA marking criteria for that question — awarding marks per step, as a human marker would. A wrong final answer with correct working still receives partial credit.
You see each student's marks per question and, crucially, totals by NESA outcome code across the whole assessment. C1.2: 71%. C1.3: 44%. That tells you something a total score doesn't.
You know the average. You don't know what to reteach.
C1.3 at 44%: that's what to reteach next lesson.
A class set that takes three hours to mark manually completes in minutes. You spend that time on feedback, reteaching, and exam strategy — not on tallying marks.
Results are broken down by NESA outcome code — not just by question number. You see exactly which outcomes your class is behind on, without manually cross-referencing the marking criteria.
Marker fatigue and criteria drift don't affect AI marking. The 28th paper is evaluated to the same standard as the first — relevant for moderation and head-of-department reporting.
No. curriq's AI marking handles the routine, criteria-based marking — the step-checking on standard question types — so you have more time for the diagnostic judgment that only a teacher can make. You always review the results before returning them to students.
It checks working-out steps. HSC marking guidelines award marks per step, and curriq evaluates each step against those criteria. A student who gets the wrong final answer but correct working can still receive partial credit, as they would in an actual HSC marking centre.
All four NSW HSC Mathematics courses: Standard 2, Advanced, Extension 1, and Extension 2.
Students can type responses directly or photograph handwritten working. curriq processes both formats.
A class set of responses typically completes within a few minutes, depending on the number of students and the length of responses. You receive a notification when results are ready.
Results are broken down by student and by NESA outcome code — not just total scores. You see, for example, that a class averaged 71% on C1.2 Differential Calculus and 44% on C1.3 Applications of Differentiation. That outcome-level view tells you something the total score doesn't.
Join the early-access waitlist. No spam, no commitments. 100% free during early access.