2024 comparison · NSW HSC maths

curriq vs SmarterMaths vs to-teach.ai

A practical guide to the HSC maths teacher tools available in 2024 — what each one actually does well, and which one is likely to fit your classroom.

This comparison reflects publicly available product information. All three tools are legitimate options — the right choice depends on what you actually need.

curriq
early access
SmarterMaths
to-teach.ai
AI marking
NESA outcome tracking
All 4 HSC courses
HSC is one of many curricula supported
Worksheet & exam generation
Student analytics
RAP reporting
HSC-specific question bank

⚠ Partial — feature exists but with limitations noted. Based on publicly available product information as of mid-2024.

Which is right for you

The honest answer — it depends on what you actually need.

SmarterMaths

A strong choice if you want deep archives of past HSC papers and RAP-style class reporting. It has years of question bank content and an established workflow.

Best for:

Teachers who prioritise past-paper practice and already use RAP data in their school's reporting cycle.

to-teach.ai

A broad AI tool that works across multiple subjects and curricula. If you teach more than maths or work in a multi-subject role, it may offer more flexibility.

Best for:

Teachers who need AI tools that span multiple subjects and don't require deep NSW HSC specificity.

Our pick
curriq

The only option with AI marking and NESA outcome tracking built specifically for the NSW HSC. If AI-assisted feedback and syllabus coverage data matter to you, this is the gap the others leave open.

Best for:

NSW HSC maths teachers who want to automate marking feedback and track NESA outcomes across their classes — in one place.

Founding cohort — places are limited

Try curriq free.

Join the early-access waitlist and we will reach out directly — no spam, no commitments. 100% free during early access.